Log in

View Full Version : Re: ISRAEL: Bush is a danger to us - YOSSI SARID - HAARETZ


November 13th 06, 08:56 AM
On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 09:27:44 GMT, "torresD" >
wrote:

>George Bush is a danger to us here -his friendship is a curse in disguise.
>
>His decision to embark on the Iraq War was a patently anti-Israel one.
>http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=786214&contrassID=2&subContrassID=4&sbSubContrassID=0
>A friendship in disguise
>By Yossi Sarid

WTF is this Hebrew ass weed bitching about? NeoCon policy to invade
Iraq was largely the working of a cabal of American Jewish Zionists
working in a think tank called AIPAC that had massive influence on US
military policy vis-a-vis Iraq.....ummm...with the unstated goal of
furthering the interests of Israel!!!

Now these Machiavellian machinations have not panned out exactly as
predicted and there is much wailing and gnashing of teeth by the
Zionists? Well, you place your bets and take your chances huh?

And does he really think the US has lost in Iraq? We went there to be
assured that Saddam had no WMD programs. We got that. We went there to
get rid of Saddam. We got that.

We thought it might be a good idea to leave Iraq a functioning
government when we left. We didn't get that, but we don't really care.
The Iraqis can now have a nice civil war between Shiite and Sunni
sects that will drag outside militaries into the fighting (i.e.,
Saudi, Syria, and Iran) and kill millions of radical Islamic Arabs.

Pull up a lawn chair and watch the fun. If you want to see real
comedy, wait until you see the Saudi (Sunni) military in action. They
couldn't fight their way out of a wet paper bag, and when they run
into the Iranians (Shiite) in Iraq they will undoubtedly get their
asses handed to them. Hundreds of thousands of Wahabbis are going to
die.....a damn shame too. ;)

And as far as the US having lost any moral superiority in this fight,
I might remind the author that we haven't pulled out the B-52's and
carpet bombed Iraq into a completely pacified area.....yet. The fool
needs to read a little history and get a true perspective on what the
US is really capable of when angered.
Dave

RadicalModerate
November 13th 06, 05:35 PM
In rec.aviation.military wrote:

> And as far as the US having lost any moral superiority in this fight,
> I might remind the author that we haven't pulled out the B-52's and
> carpet bombed Iraq into a completely pacified area.....yet. The fool
> needs to read a little history and get a true perspective on what the
> US is really capable of when angered.
> Dave

Unless you're planning on going nuclear or breaking out the "bug spray", I
doubt we have enough heavy bombers left to pacify Iraq in the manner you
desire.


--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
From: address IS Valid.

November 14th 06, 09:14 AM
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 17:35:54 +0000 (UTC),
(RadicalModerate) wrote:

>In rec.aviation.military wrote:
>
>> And as far as the US having lost any moral superiority in this fight,
>> I might remind the author that we haven't pulled out the B-52's and
>> carpet bombed Iraq into a completely pacified area.....yet. The fool
>> needs to read a little history and get a true perspective on what the
>> US is really capable of when angered.
>> Dave
>
>Unless you're planning on going nuclear or breaking out the "bug spray", I
>doubt we have enough heavy bombers left to pacify Iraq in the manner you
>desire.

We have somewhere betwee 90 and 100 operational B-52's. 5 or 6 of them
could work the trouble spots in Iraq down to nothing in about 1 week.
Dave

Google